@Donovan - as a pro-freedom president, Ron Paul would actually have a lot more power in promoting freedom than all the statist presidents have in promoting their statist agenda. Most of the agencies in government fall under the executive branch, and as the head of the executive branch he can issue an executive order to them essentially saying "don't enforce the bad laws". So during his term, the drug war could effectively come to a stop, people could not be prosecuted for "tax evasion", he could bring all the troops home, etc.
@Hopeful - other than his anti-immigration stance (which is the *only* problem I have with him), in what ways is he not a social libertarian?