Last year, Jason Boehle generously shared his speaking slot at SXSW with me. I had a great time, met a lot of great people, and, according to the feedback we got, gave a good talk. This year I want to do an updated version of my Risk Speech.
To get there, I need people to vote for me on the SXSW panel picker. If you have 2-3 minutes to register and vote, it would mean a lot to me. Unlike last year, where I forgot to fully charge my camera battery, I promise to post a video of the speech to the site.
The voting link is right hurrrrrr. If you have a few extra seconds after voting, you can also leave a comment at the bottom of the description on the site.
A post with actual substance is coming later this week.
By the way, if you want to read a great book, check out The Murder Room, a book about real life detectives on par with fictional Sherlock Holmes. The writing is a little bit awkward, but the content is so incredible that I read it within 24 hours.
Sorry there hasn't been any news on the mysterious startup. It's coming along very well and I hope to have something to show you guys by November. We got a great domain name, which I'll share once we finally come up with a logo to throw up there.
Some Tasksmash codes to bribe voters:
you got my vote bro...and if there is anything tall to climb in Austin, we'll hit that up...and maybe i'll bring the rappelling gear.
Got your back man. Thanks for inspiring us and sharing your tips on this blog, it's the least I can do to pay you back!
I already know that this post is going to get a lot of negative comments like the religion one. And that's because this "every vote counts" dogma that everyone loves so much shares a lot with religion. It's a belief that's held true without a single bit of compelling evidence, and it's a strong belief.
But before I get into that, let's talk about some other things.
First, Obama won and I'm happy about that. I don't think that he's a superhero like a lot of people do. When I look at his positions I disagree with most of them. I disagree with most of McCain's positions as well.
I have to admit something. I am scared.
After giving my third speech, my evaluator, Betsy, noted that it was "interesting" that I decided to give two speeches back to back. She wasn't there for my first one, so she didn't know that in fact it was my third consecutive speech. Betsy noted that when giving speeches so frequently, one robs himself of a key Toastmasters benefit: taking from others' speeches and evaluations and adding the good things learned to one's one repertoire. How right is she? Is it possible that the goal that I have set for myself of giving a speech every week for a year will be damaging to my learning process instead of an accelerator for it?
Another thing that is making me sweat is wondering whether my club members will be willing to hear from me so often. Will they care to see me up there every week? Will I come up with enough to say to keep it interesting over the coming months, or will my speeches become predictable and thus monotonous? Well, I suppose that if I focus on coming up with a list of topic ideas varied enough, I can at least get the other members of the club to stay on their toes with respect to my speech themes. I have learned that vocal variety is an important element of public speaking, but a special element of this challenge will be topic variety as well. Boring is bad.
By speaking every week, I will require an evaluation every single week in addition to about 10 minutes of everyone's time. My goal does not make a small demand of their resources. If my fellow Toastmasters get something out of it in the form of topic knowledge, elements to incorporate into their own speaking, and inspiration to improve themselves, I will be at least breaking even. If I can become good enough to both speak and function in one of the key roles at the same meeting (like Toastmaster--the one that runs the show, or Topicsmaster--the one who facilitates Table Topics), then I will feel better about demanding so much attention.