I actually found this on boingboing.net. I shouldn't even post their name since they're one of the few big aggregating sites that has never run one of my articles. But hey, when they've got a good article, they've got a good article.
They posted This MP3 about how to always do the right thing. It's brilliant. I've actually been wanting to write a post to that effect, but the speaker, Dan Gilbert, did a much better job than I would have.
The essence of the speech is that EV is king. EV is expected value, a term used commonly in the gambling world. I would explain what it is, but if you listen to the lecture you will have a better understanding and then I won't have to type as much.
I always try to live my life by maximizing EV. Most people live their lives trying to minimize risk, which is a truly awful strategy. I'd say that roughly 90% of my favorite experiences in life have been the result of taking risk, but maximizing EV. The story of How I became a pickup artist is a great example. Moving to LA was risky - I was leaving my friends, moving in with people I didn't know, and was paying a ton of money for the privilege. However, it was clear that the upside was huge, so I did it. I'm glad I did.
Listen to the lecture think about how it applies to your life, and post your thoughts here.
thanks for the alternate link...been looking for this mp3 from Dan Gilbert and I got the 404 on 3 different websites before finding this post.
Expected value is a term from probability theory and statistics... you should have not dropped out of school!
The "time" question is interesting because the ODDS part of the equation doesn't come into play. Both choices are 100% odds.
So the thing that differntiates them is the dollar amount and the time. I think "time" would fall under value and can be subjective, just as the value of chosing a watermelon or an orange could come down to an individuals taste preference. But, like the speaker said, the context is everything. If you're literally starving, you'd put taste considerations aside and surely take the larger watermelon for the higher calorie count. Or if you were offered the choice while walking on the street, you may like watermelon slightly better but have no interest in lugging it around so you chose the orange.
The first thing that occured to me is that the "Happiness Expected" from a given situation is nearly useless because it does not take one really important thing into consideration: time.
For example: would I rather have $5 right now or $100 in one-hundred years? According to the equation from the lecture, (HapExpt = OdInFavr * Value$) it is suggested that $100 over 100 years is a better deal. But obviously, it is not, because I probably won't be around to collect the money in a hundred years.
So I suggest we amend the equation to: HapExpt = [(OdInFavr * Value$) / Time (days)]; the total projected happiness being the total profit derived from a given situation divided by how long it took us to accomplish.
Henceforth, this new unit to measure happiness (odds * $)/(time) shall be called the "Mazer", in honor of me, because I invented it. I expect it to be added to school curriculums nationwide by 2021.
The mp3 is 49 minutes long, but it's like sitting in one of those rare classes that are so fascinating you're sad to see it end.
The happiness equation is interesting, but it may incomplete as presented. You are told to compare the "probability of winning" against "how much enjoyment you will receive". But where exactly does the "consequences of failure" come into play? Something may be very easy to obtain, and be extremely enjoyable, but the consequences of failure could be extremely UNenjoyable. Take speeding in a car for example. Easy to do, you most likely won't crash the first 100 times you do it, and extremely thrilling and satisfying, but the consequences of failure is serious injury or death. How do you decide? Discuss.
. The happiness equation takes into account the probability of
Ty speaks briefly about risk, but really, risk is part of the equation too.
First - let me get this out of the way : I fed a squirrel. I saw a bunch of squirrels so I went back to the RV and got some almonds. I put one in my hand and sat around forever, and finally a squirrel came and ate it. It was the cutest thing ever - he put his little front paws on my hand to eat it. Now I'm obsessed with feeding the squirrels, but I haven't had any more success.
Ok, so let me share a few things with you that will keep you entertained for a while.
I read the book, "The Four Hour Workweek"
Dan Redford has built a life at the intersection of China/Michigan relations, doing international U.S./China business in raising millions of dollars of investment from Chinese clients into the United States. Knowing he wanted to be involved in U.S./China business, his first large opportunity came as a result of being a paid attendee covering the Shanghai Expo, and connecting with traditional media throughout Michigan as part of that trip. All along the way, he's connected with great people, lent a helping hand, and taken leadership roles in organizations.
In this interview to promote his GiveGetWin deal, a Group Class on Establishing Leadership and Influence, he tells his journey towards leadership and influence positions, and gives you extremely practical guidelines on doing that in your life.
"The Journey Through Fear To Influence" by Dan Redford, as told to Sebastian Marshall
My family really helped me become a leader. My younger brother is a famous basketball player where we're from. As the oldest of our family, it was a really big challenge for me. Seeing my younger brother rise as an athlete in the community and I didn't have to the skills to do that, it hurt.
I didn't pursue playing basketball in high school for a year because I anticipated my younger brother would be starting as a freshman and not wanting to compete with him.